Данная тема возникла по материалам, опубликованным в СБ от 1 июля 2009 года (англ.):
In this public edition of the watchtower it uses an illustration of a piece of furniture to help explain why Jehovah tolerated polygamy.
И комментарий:But the more interesting point I thought was the reasoning in the first paragraph in the second column about jehovah warning his people when they strayed from his standards. It says "However,
he knew in advance that his people would often fail to obey even the most basic of commands, such as the one against idolatry. (Exodus 32:9).
If they would struggle to obey so basic a law, how would they fare with a law against polygamy? With
his perfect grasp of human nature, Jehovah saw that it was not yet the time to forbid that practice, which was already long-established in those days. Had he done so,
Satan would have found a very easy means of seducing them into sin."
Is it just me or do others feel that there is something wrong with this so called reasoning. If the Isrealites were his so-called 'chosen people' why was he constantly setting them up for failure if "he knew in advance they would fail to obey even the most basic of commands"?
Знаете, господа, но что-то смахивает сие на очередной "принцип меньшего зла"
Неужто Божья видимая начинает таковым баловацца?
Вход
Регистрация
Библиотека
Правила
FAQ
Поиск
я о том же